xinoehp512 he/him Posted September 17, 2023 Report Share Posted September 17, 2023 Well, there is a meaning that has been agreed upon and hasn't really been challenged by an alternative, even if that meaning could be more precisely defined. Vote for me as moderator and I will change the text to clarify the exact meaning. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Doomstick he/him Posted September 17, 2023 Author Report Share Posted September 17, 2023 (edited) 5 hours ago, dannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnex said: just vote for proposal 66 and that doesn’t matter anymore retroactivity go brrr That’s not how things work, you can’t vote on a proposal if it is not legal, as it does not enter the proposal pool and does and does not gain a PR#. by definition a proposal cannot break rules, as if it does it cannot be a proposal. Edited September 17, 2023 by Doomstick 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wandering Wizard he/him Posted September 18, 2023 Report Share Posted September 18, 2023 I'm going inactive for now so the turn passes to @xinoehp512 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xinoehp512 he/him Posted September 18, 2023 Report Share Posted September 18, 2023 On 9/17/2023 at 0:06 AM, Doomstick said: ...I forgot to account for that didn't I? Someone fix this please! no please i can't keep up im starting school soon. Very well... aye to 63. I propose PR#66: Friendly Fire: On (Amendment, dependent on PR#52) The text of PR#52 reading "Each card is majorly victorious over the card with number one greater than it and minorly victorious over the card with number 2 greater than it (e.g. the Bouquet is majorly victorious over the Handwritten Card and minorly victorious over the Wad of Cash)." has the following sentence added after it. "The Ring is majorly victorious over the Bouquet and minorly victorious over the Handwritten Card. The Token of Eternal Friendship is minorly victorious over the Bouquet." I propose PR#67: The Health Rule (Amendment to ER#28) The text of ER#28 reading "spend any resources that they have" is replaced by "take any actions that require spending resources." I also propose PR#68: The Gameboard Rule (Amendment to ER#12) The text of ER#12 has the following added to the end: "The game piece of a player represents that player, and may be referred to as that player. They may be treated as identical for gameplay purposes." 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Doomstick he/him Posted September 18, 2023 Author Report Share Posted September 18, 2023 Aye to 66-68 PR#69: I Couldn’t Resist: Nice. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NerdyAarakocra They/Them Posted September 27, 2023 Report Share Posted September 27, 2023 Quote May I join? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wandering Wizard he/him Posted October 3, 2023 Report Share Posted October 3, 2023 Whose turn is it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.