DrakeMarshall he/him Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 1 hour ago, RoyalBeeMage said: Drake! the research officer pm’d me in the first few minutes of day 2 before I woke up or they reilised that pms were closed. They told me because they wanted to remain anonymous. 1 hour ago, Araris Valerian said: No rules have been (significantly) broken here, continue as planned. Alright so you're definitely lying. RBM. And there's no way RBM scanned me himself either, because I targeted him last night with my Steward ability. I'll remain open-minded to the possibility of a reaction test, but obviously I won't withdraw my vote from you until you withdraw your claim 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashbringer he/him Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 Yeaaaah pretty sure that means RBM is lying here. Unless the Steward showed a self-alignment as Evil? But that wouldn't make any sense anyway (and even if it did, would still be e!RBM). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrakeMarshall he/him Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 (edited) as an aside, I would personally rather not do a no-exe, even if we didn't have the RBM thing playing out In theory, it gives us more information at lylo, but it also gives us fewer votes, and the elims more control over who is talking and making the decisions when it all goes down. and there's something to be said for pumping the brakes just being sort of bad for village morale It might be the best move in some theoretical perfect village, but in the one we live in, I don't think the tradeoffs are worth it honestly ok back to your regularly scheduled programming (...edit: oh, and there's also potentially a malicious third party who wins if we take too long to end the game? granted, they might not be in this game, but delaying might cost us here) Edited July 24 by DrakeMarshall 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyalBeeMage he/him Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 Wow I was not expecting that reaction to my claim. Though in hindsight it seems obvious to me now. I suppose I might as well claim my role. I am the research officer. My plan was originally to claim that someone pm ed me about drake being an elim but since pms were closed i had to improvise slightly. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffeecat she/her Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 well if drake poisoned bee, wouldnt that make bee read drake as evil? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrakeMarshall he/him Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 If Bee is telling the truth, then afaik the only mechanical way it's possible for Bee to produces a guilty result with his scan is if Bee himself evaluates as evil under an alignment scan, because the Steward ability points his action back at himself. Except that's fairly nonsensical e!RBM knows my alignment already, and has no real need of scanning anybody, so e!RBM probably just lies about having scanned a certain result, even if he has the role. Or if he did actually go through the motions of scanning me, he'd have known something was wrong after unexpectedly getting a guilty result, and probably wouldn't be doing this. ...I'll caveat that it's possible that there's a framer who framed village!RBM last night and therefore village!RBM redirected into scanning himself got an evil result. But since this requires both 1) a framer to exist and 2) the framer to have targeted RBM specifically, I don't think it's as likely as RBM not telling the truth. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CadCom he/him Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 Alright, so RBM claims research officer PMd them, having scanned drake as evil. Drake counter claims saying they're steward, and poisoned RBM, so if RBM actually did the scan in their own, then that wouldn't be good either. RBM claims that they actually are research officer. --- Should have asked a few clarifying questions earlier since now I might not get answers. but @Kasimir can a role listed as black and bold technically be either alignment? And the more important clarifying question(not really): what are the NAs that need to get to sleep tonight? (Or potentially last night)(I just didn't recognize the abbreviation) --- Back to my thoughts: none of the definite evil roles have scan ability, and likely wouldn't need an alignment scan, makes me lean, and seems like an odd claim for an elim to make what laying low is probably a better strat. I'm inclined to village read RBM. Drakes counter claim seems valid too, because they shared that they had targeted RBM before RBM revealed they were Research Officer. So to me the only logical explanation is the one Drake believed to be least likely, that the infiltrator also targeted RBM, to make them scan as evil. I'm going to soft clear RBM and Drake for now, but with Drake, I'm adding in the caveat that if black roles could be good or bad, it's possible that he is a saboteur steward. At this time, I think I'll actually retract my No Exe since there is more info now, it would be more unwise to use it. I don't know who I will vote for quite yet though. It won't be RBM or Drake most likely though. Stay tuned. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrakeMarshall he/him Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 6 hours ago, CadCom said: Alright, so RBM claims research officer PMd them, having scanned drake as evil. Drake counter claims saying they're steward, and poisoned RBM, so if RBM actually did the scan in their own, then that wouldn't be good either. RBM claims that they actually are research officer. --- Should have asked a few clarifying questions earlier since now I might not get answers. but @Kasimir can a role listed as black and bold technically be either alignment? And the more important clarifying question(not really): what are the NAs that need to get to sleep tonight? (Or potentially last night)(I just didn't recognize the abbreviation) --- Back to my thoughts: none of the definite evil roles have scan ability, and likely wouldn't need an alignment scan, makes me lean, and seems like an odd claim for an elim to make what laying low is probably a better strat. I'm inclined to village read RBM. Drakes counter claim seems valid too, because they shared that they had targeted RBM before RBM revealed they were Research Officer. So to me the only logical explanation is the one Drake believed to be least likely, that the infiltrator also targeted RBM, to make them scan as evil. I'm going to soft clear RBM and Drake for now, but with Drake, I'm adding in the caveat that if black roles could be good or bad, it's possible that he is a saboteur steward. At this time, I think I'll actually retract my No Exe since there is more info now, it would be more unwise to use it. I don't know who I will vote for quite yet though. It won't be RBM or Drake most likely though. Stay tuned. Kas can correct me on this if I'm wrong, but I'm like 90% sure that roles listed in black can belong to any alignment. If they were confirmed to have an alignment, they would be listed in the color of that alignment. The part I think you're missing here is that we might just be at LyLo. Supposing there's a Lieutenant, and the elims are aware of that, either through being in the doc or establishing PM contact or just blind guessing the distro. In that case, our split today is potentially 4/2/1 between villagers, elims, and lieutenant. (Unlikely to be a Fourth Bridge or other neutral in this world, I guess.) If the Lieutenant wins they exit the game, so this scenario is functionally a 4/2 split. An incorrect lynch puts us at 3/2 and an elim kill puts us at 2/2. It makes quite a bit of sense for the elims not to lay low in this situation, because all they need is one mislynch. A villager claiming a guilty scan today would have to have actually scanned an elim, which only happens some of the time. But an elim claims a guilty scan 100% of the time today, if they think it'll give them a relatively easy misyeet. I stand by the most likely explanation here being that RBM is lying. It's trying to shoehorn a specific bandwagon at what might well be LyLo, it's timing in the day looks like an attempt to disrupt existing bandwagons that the elims didn't like, and RBM initially tried to make it look like some other secret person was actually on the hook for the scan's truthfulness and not him. I don't think it's a very credible claim, and every post RBM makes where he isn't saying it's a reaction test is making it less likely that I'd believe him if he suddenly pulled a 180 and said it was one. If there's a framer, I'm sorry. (merge edit?) ...Actually wait no, I have an idea. I think there's a way we can go about resolving this with less risks: If there's a framer, then they don't have any good role that they can safely claim. @everyone - It might be time to do a mass claim tbh. In the framer world, this will probably help us a lot with catching them. I think that's well worth it. It would likely save us 2 misyeets and place a lot of pressure on the elims, which is probably the difference between losing and having a real fighting chance. And in the non-framer world, it's probably LyLo already, and you can't take your secrets with you beyond the grave >:P Might as well work with as much information as possible today instead of just sitting on our hands. Either way, seems like maybe it's in our best interests to just get it over with. I aint gonna force anyone though, obviously. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kasimir he/him Posted July 24 Author Report Share Posted July 24 7 hours ago, CadCom said: Should have asked a few clarifying questions earlier since now I might not get answers. but @Kasimir can a role listed as black and bold technically be either alignment? And the more important clarifying question(not really): what are the NAs that need to get to sleep tonight? (Or potentially last night)(I just didn't recognize the abbreviation) 1. Black and bold is any non-neutral alignment. Basically either V/E. 2. NAs—North Americans. I'm aware of where my timezone intersects theirs so basically it was "if y'all don't do it now you probably won't get a chance because my being able to check will be rare/odd intervals like rn." 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CadCom he/him Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 1 hour ago, DrakeMarshall said: The part I think you're missing here is that we might just be at LyLo. Supposing there's a Lieutenant, and the elims are aware of that, either through being in the doc or establishing PM contact or just blind guessing the distro. In that case, our split today is potentially 4/2/1 between villagers, elims, and lieutenant. (Unlikely to be a Fourth Bridge or other neutral in this world, I guess.) If the Lieutenant wins they exit the game, so this scenario is functionally a 4/2 split. An incorrect lynch puts us at 3/2 and an elim kill puts us at 2/2. I agree we may be at Lylo. I'm hoping that the distro doesn't put us there but it most certainly could. I'm not opposed to a mass claim. Depending on how others feel, I may claim later this cycle. For now I'm gonna hike. (IRL 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrakeMarshall he/him Posted July 25 Report Share Posted July 25 Vote Tally RoyalBeeMage (2): Ashbringer, DrakeMarshall No Exe (1): Coffeecat DrakeMarshall (1): RoyalBeeMage Coffeecat (1): xinoehp512 ...Just a reminder, if it is LyLo, then splitting the vote or declining to vote is likely not a great idea. Vote however your conscience leads you but do so with all of the facts ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (@The Unknown Order pinging you bc you haven't voted yet) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyalBeeMage he/him Posted July 25 Report Share Posted July 25 1 minute ago, DrakeMarshall said: Vote Tally RoyalBeeMage (2): Ashbringer, DrakeMarshall No Exe (1): Coffeecat DrakeMarshall (1): RoyalBeeMage Coffeecat (1): xinoehp512 ...Just a reminder, if it is LyLo, then splitting the vote or declining to vote is likely not a great idea. Vote however your conscience leads you but do so with all of the facts ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (@The Unknown Order pinging you bc you haven't voted yet) Sorry but what is lylo? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrakeMarshall he/him Posted July 25 Report Share Posted July 25 Just now, RoyalBeeMage said: Sorry but what is lylo? It's when the village only barely still has majority, and needs to vote correctly or lose. It seems at least a real possibility that it's the situation we're in. ...I flatly refuse to derpclear you over a question like this given your claim, it's falsity, and it's timing, but if it's a legit question then hopefully that helps. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unknown Order he/him Posted July 25 Report Share Posted July 25 15 minutes ago, RoyalBeeMage said: Sorry but what is lylo? C'mon now. I zero believe this. RoyalBeeMage 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffeecat she/her Posted July 25 Report Share Posted July 25 awh dont be so hard on the bee, haven't they asked for clarifications on certain acronyms before? either way it doesn't gain them anything. I am currently thinking about something. I will update in a while, i do plan to vote soon 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyalBeeMage he/him Posted July 25 Report Share Posted July 25 10 minutes ago, DrakeMarshall said: It's when the village only barely still has majority, and needs to vote correctly or lose. It seems at least a real possibility that it's the situation we're in. ...I flatly refuse to derpclear you over a question like this given your claim, it's falsity, and it's timing, but if it's a legit question then hopefully that helps. 5 minutes ago, The Unknown Order said: C'mon now. I zero believe this. RoyalBeeMage What’s wrong with me just asking a question? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unknown Order he/him Posted July 25 Report Share Posted July 25 1 minute ago, Coffeecat said: awh dont be so hard on the bee, haven't they asked for clarifications on certain acronyms before? either way it doesn't gain them anything. I am currently thinking about something. I will update in a while, i do plan to vote soon 1 minute ago, RoyalBeeMage said: What’s wrong with me just asking a question? How many games is Bee at now? Lylo is a really common term, I would think RBM has asked this in the several games they've played already, if not seeing me myself reference it pretty clearly in the several elim games we've played together. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyalBeeMage he/him Posted July 25 Report Share Posted July 25 8 minutes ago, The Unknown Order said: How many games is Bee at now? Lylo is a really common term, I would think RBM has asked this in the several games they've played already, if not seeing me myself reference it pretty clearly in the several elim games we've played together. Never before now has lylo actually been close to applying to me. I’m fairly sure that this is my second village game. Not counting the rekoners one 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashbringer he/him Posted July 25 Report Share Posted July 25 Probably doesn’t help that half of us call it Exelo (or maybe that’s just me). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyalBeeMage he/him Posted July 25 Report Share Posted July 25 2 minutes ago, Ashbringer said: Probably doesn’t help that half of us call it Exelo (or maybe that’s just me). You all really should compile all of your acronyms and phrases for convenience 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashbringer he/him Posted July 25 Report Share Posted July 25 4 minutes ago, RoyalBeeMage said: You all really should compile all of your acronyms and phrases for convenience This... actually doesn't have lylo/exelo on there but it does have most other ones used! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CadCom he/him Posted July 25 Report Share Posted July 25 I want it known that I disagree firmly with the lynch in RBM. Unfortunately I don't have an alternate suggestion right now. I'm going to reread it all now see where I feel peoples alignments truly are. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffeecat she/her Posted July 25 Report Share Posted July 25 Well i'm going to come out and say it. I am in a lieutenant group with drake. I think its late enough that the evil can't do much with this info. While Drake's general vibe up to this moment made me read them as villager, their trying to figure out the distro and other things, this is not really Faction indicative. Also I have suspected Drake of being evil because no one in this liutenant doc has been targeted by anyone except for xino or TUO, which makes me see them in a more villagery way. Xino is aggressive but not necessarily evil. this seems to me like the evil team keeping us alive to get the lieutenant out of the game. Now Bee's claim and drake's almost over-reaction to it makes me a bit more suspicious. So i see it this way. We are going to exe someone today. If we exe bee, we also loose the liutenant. while if we kill Drake we are keeping the lieutenant as a confirmed good role. I think i want drake to confirm who the lieutenant is with the rest of you, if you are a villager this is convenient to you i believe. Either way we will only be loosing one person today, not only that but we get some really important info from their flip. if they are good it would cast RBM in a negative light, etc. So, Drake, what do you say to this? why do you want the Lieutenant to win so much? they have even said this in the doc. as villagers, we do not want the lieutenant to win! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CadCom he/him Posted July 25 Report Share Posted July 25 9 minutes ago, Coffeecat said: I am in a lieutenant group with drake. You don't have to share who, but do y'all know which one is the lieutenant? Of course you don't have to share that either but a yes or no would be nice. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffeecat she/her Posted July 25 Report Share Posted July 25 We do know, not 100% certain of course but they have claimed and I have seen no reason to doubt them. Also I do think it's better if I say who they are, but I'm not sure? If Drake is evil then not saying anything is just keeping info from the village. And even if Drake is good, there isn't much the evil team can do, except try to not get me or Drake killed today 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.