The combination of Ruin, Hemalurgy, and Realmatic theory on metals seems inconsistent at times.
We know how Scadrians can use their abilities off world, how non-Scadrians can gain Metalborn abilities, why Elantrians can't use their magic off world, etc.
But non-Scadrians using Hemalurgy outside of Scadrial? Scadrians do not have access to Hemalirgy because they were Imvested by Ruin (as with Allomancers being invested by Preservation), but they have Connection because they're native to Scadrial. So now Allomancy and Feruchemy make sense to be able to use off world, but Hemalurgy doesnt.
The above link is to a WoB where he confirms that non-Scadrians are capable of using Hemalurgy because Ruin "doesn't care."
There is also an Ars Arcanum entry from Khriss where she comments on Hemalurgy most likely being possible to perform anywhere in the Cosmere as long as the person doing it had the proper knowledge and Intent.
Intent
Investiture
Connection ️
The rules of Connection seem broken with Hemalurgy. The Cosmere is FULL of different examples of Connection's importance and Connection's effects on the different magics of the Cosmere.
Connection can determine if someone has magical abilities or not, whether they can use their abilities, and where they can use them.
How can somebody who is from another system, who would presumably have no Connecrion to Ruin, be able to use Hemalurgy?
I really enjoy the choice Brandon Sanderson made in developing hard magics for the Cosmere. I really enjoy the blend of high fantasy and science fiction.
But now I need this to make sense. I understand how a Scadrian can use Allomancy anywhere in the Cosmere. I understand why Elantrians classically cannot. I understand why it's exceedingly difficult to take spren outside the Rosharan system. The exceptions to these also make sense.
Hemalurgy seems broken to me at the moment, and actually makes FAR more sense as an Old Magic or a sort of pseudo-magic manifest of the laws that govern the Cosmere.
Even if Hemalurgy was a practice based entirely on Realmatic theory, it would make more sense, and it would allow for the incorporeal laws of the Cosmere to check out at well. Connection would be Cosmere wide, Intent would be a matter of knowledge (simply knowing that an Intent is needed and what that means). Investiture would obviously be coming from the donor. And being able to pull it off would be a matter of knowledge and regular physical ability. This makes sense.
Hemalurgy being of Ruin does not make sense. Connection suddenly being inconsequential is driving me in loops. Every single other magic strictly follows Connection as a law of the Cosmere, but Hemalurgy doesn't because Ruin doesn't care and just wants to destroy? We know the Shards are bound by the laws of the Cosmere just like everything else. "Apathy and indifference" being the explanation to this exception makes me wanna cry. Connection is one of the most important laws of the Cosmere .magic systems, and APATHY is what breaks it?
Somebody make this make sense for me, please. I've read up and down and all-around CoppermindWiku, and this has been my conclusion. Perhaps you clever lot of the 17th Shard could give me the dose of cognitive dissonance I require. I'm leaning toward an unkeyed Nicrosil retcon, but if there's a simpler explanation I'd like to hear it.
Question
ReuinifierOfTheShards
The combination of Ruin, Hemalurgy, and Realmatic theory on metals seems inconsistent at times.
We know how Scadrians can use their abilities off world, how non-Scadrians can gain Metalborn abilities, why Elantrians can't use their magic off world, etc.
But non-Scadrians using Hemalurgy outside of Scadrial? Scadrians do not have access to Hemalirgy because they were Imvested by Ruin (as with Allomancers being invested by Preservation), but they have Connection because they're native to Scadrial. So now Allomancy and Feruchemy make sense to be able to use off world, but Hemalurgy doesnt.
https://wob.coppermind.net/events/48/#e559
The above link is to a WoB where he confirms that non-Scadrians are capable of using Hemalurgy because Ruin "doesn't care."
There is also an Ars Arcanum entry from Khriss where she comments on Hemalurgy most likely being possible to perform anywhere in the Cosmere as long as the person doing it had the proper knowledge and Intent.
Intent
Investiture
Connection ️
The rules of Connection seem broken with Hemalurgy. The Cosmere is FULL of different examples of Connection's importance and Connection's effects on the different magics of the Cosmere.
Connection can determine if someone has magical abilities or not, whether they can use their abilities, and where they can use them.
How can somebody who is from another system, who would presumably have no Connecrion to Ruin, be able to use Hemalurgy?
I really enjoy the choice Brandon Sanderson made in developing hard magics for the Cosmere. I really enjoy the blend of high fantasy and science fiction.
But now I need this to make sense. I understand how a Scadrian can use Allomancy anywhere in the Cosmere. I understand why Elantrians classically cannot. I understand why it's exceedingly difficult to take spren outside the Rosharan system. The exceptions to these also make sense.
Hemalurgy seems broken to me at the moment, and actually makes FAR more sense as an Old Magic or a sort of pseudo-magic manifest of the laws that govern the Cosmere.
Even if Hemalurgy was a practice based entirely on Realmatic theory, it would make more sense, and it would allow for the incorporeal laws of the Cosmere to check out at well. Connection would be Cosmere wide, Intent would be a matter of knowledge (simply knowing that an Intent is needed and what that means). Investiture would obviously be coming from the donor. And being able to pull it off would be a matter of knowledge and regular physical ability. This makes sense.
Hemalurgy being of Ruin does not make sense. Connection suddenly being inconsequential is driving me in loops. Every single other magic strictly follows Connection as a law of the Cosmere, but Hemalurgy doesn't because Ruin doesn't care and just wants to destroy? We know the Shards are bound by the laws of the Cosmere just like everything else. "Apathy and indifference" being the explanation to this exception makes me wanna cry. Connection is one of the most important laws of the Cosmere .magic systems, and APATHY is what breaks it?
Somebody make this make sense for me, please. I've read up and down and all-around CoppermindWiku, and this has been my conclusion. Perhaps you clever lot of the 17th Shard could give me the dose of cognitive dissonance I require. I'm leaning toward an unkeyed Nicrosil retcon, but if there's a simpler explanation I'd like to hear it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
4 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.